No-image-available2Documents
recently released in litigation between the estate of pop star Michael Jackson
and the IRS showed that a large part of the dispute revolves around the value
of Jackson’s image and likeness. While the estate assessed the value of his
image at $2,105, the IRS’s valuation was more than $430 million.

When it comes to celebrities,
image is everything. And since the IRS has begun to use “image and likeness” as
a factor and real-dollar taxable asset in estate valuation, this statement
holds true even after death. Such is the case of the Michael Jackson estate.

You can read all about this tax
saga in a recent Bloomberg article
titled “Protests Surge as IRS Sets Jackson Image at
$430 Million: Taxes
.

For most of us, the value of our
“image and likeness” is not likely to push our estates into ever higher estate
tax exposure. However, Michael Jackson’s image was not only recognizable, but
outright valuable it seems. What was
a blessing in life has turned out to be a curse after death.

Now, the Jackson estate was not
caught napping on this one. No, the estate offered up $2,105 in value to the
IRS for his “image and likeness.” The IRS was not amused and its calculator
came up with a value of $430 million – and then went to collect for penalties
at the estate’s failure to anticipate such big numbers.

While it is hard to deny that
the Jackson image (at any stage of his career) is anything less than a cultural
icon, this would seem to be a hard thing to properly own and even properly
value.

To help put things into
perspective, too, remember that the “image and likeness” of the long-deceased
Tupac made its return to the stage just a short time ago, causing havoc in
estate planning circles even without the ire of the IRS. [If you missed that Forbes article it was titled “What Does Tupac's Hologram Mean For Other
Celebrity Estates?
”]

This image valuation is a major
point of contention in the Jackson estate and is instructive for the entire
estate planning community. For example, the move is causing a pushback from
estate planners and celebrities trying to keep their planning straight (how do
you plan for your image?), and the original article explores how the battle
lines are drawing.

Whether you are a king of pop,
likely to lead a music festival post-mortem and in hologram, or have a face
that could launch a thousand ships (Helen of Troy), this case offers some
insight into the role of value when it comes to IRS math.

Please
visit our website for information on
elder law and estate planning issues, and sign up for our free monthly e-newsletter
The archive on our website contains numerous blog posts on these legal
areas as well.  You can also “friend” us
on Facebook (R Christine Brown) to receive periodic posts on elder law issues.

Reference: Bloomberg
(September 16, 2013) “Protests Surge as IRS Sets Jackson Image at
$430 Million: Taxes